Tea Partiers pour into Anniston
by Patrick McCreless
Apr 16, 2010 | 3269 views | 37 37 comments | 17 17 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Rainy Day Patriots Tea Party
Rainy Day Patriots Tea Party
Adorned in the colors of the American flag, Bill Veazey sat quietly in a chair outside a closed grocery store on Quintard Avenue.

In his right hand was a handmade sign featuring a caricature of President Barack Obama and writing demanding the country move away from socialism.

Veazey had never protested before, but then again, he said he had never been so worried about his country.

“It’s about the only thing I can do,” Veazey said. “I don’t like what’s going on. The people in power are re-writing the Constitution.”

Veazey of Anniston was one of around 200 people who poured into the city Thursday to attend a tea party event, hosted by the Birmingham-based tea party group, the Rainy Day Patriots.

“This is not the military militia in the west … we’re not those people,” Veazey said. “We’re your next-door neighbors.”

During the event, which featured guest speakers from the community, attendees with various homemade signs lined up alongside Quintard Avenue between 16th and 17th Streets. Many motorists who drove by honked their horns.

Carrie Poole of Jacksonville carried a small sign that promoted the abolishment of the Internal Revenue Service.

“I think there is a fairer way of being taxed, be it a fairer tax or a flat tax,” Poole said. “Granted, we must have someone to administer what we have, but there must be a less-expensive way of doing it. Smaller government is better government.”

Like other tea parties held across the country since the movement began a year ago, Anniston’s event focused on various grievances with the government, the supposed liberal bias of the media and the nation’s rising debt.

“Unfortunately the truth is, most of the media is not going to talk about the real situation,” Veazey said. “We’ve got laws being made by the Supreme Court. “What (the government) is doing is setting us up for socialism … when we’re having a government takeover of businesses and healthcare. It’s just scary.”

William Lester, professor of political science at Jacksonville State University, was the first speaker at the event.

“It would be much, much easier to stay home,” Lester said. “But I can’t, I can’t be silent. We are on the edge of bankrupting the next generation.”

Lester said the founding fathers of the country set up a political system whereby the people could have a revolution, not with bloodshed, but with votes.

“We have a marvelous system where our voices are heard,” he said. “We can change our government in a peaceful way and that’s exactly why we’re here.”

Lester told the crowd that they had to vote into office courageous leaders who understand the current situation.

“If you stand around and just wave signs, if that’s all you do, then all this means absolutely nothing.”

Elois Zeanah, president of the Alabama Federation of Republican Women, also spoke to the audience about the dangers of the country’s rising debt, which is now in the trillions of dollars.

“Our nation today is being forcibly marched to socialism and bankruptcy,” Zeanah said. “Government has many ways to take our liberties and one way is to drown us in debt.”

Zeanah said the government should cut taxes and entitlements such as the government’s recent overhaul of healthcare to help move the country back into prosperity.

Contact staff writer Patrick McCreless at 256-235-3561.

comments (37)
« 1hanover@bellsouth.net wrote on Thursday, Apr 22 at 11:34 AM »
I've attended three tea party events and was very disappointed each time. No one was taking ownership for my party's (GOP) responsibility in the condition our country was allowed to get into. Instead it was an anti liberal, anti Democrat, anti Obama feeding frenzy.

I frequently heard comments to the affect of "we don't want the economy to recover while Obama is in office" and "we don't want American's to get their jobs back while Obama is in office",etc, etc, etc.

It was a very disturbing and disgusting experience. A friend of mine went to the event in Anniston and had a similar experience.

« birdbrain2@mail.com wrote on Thursday, Apr 22 at 09:43 AM »
And Obama has increased the federal debt more in one year than Bush did in 8 years. Plus, he's increasing taxes on EVERYBODY (well, at least those who PAY taxes).

Yeah, it's all Bush's fault.

The tea partiers aren't just mad at Obama, or the Democrats. They're mad at Washington, Republican and Democrat. They're mad about being taxed to death by these people and watching them flush their hard earned money down the craphole known as Washington, D. C., then whine about not having enough money and wanting to raise taxes for more.

Enough is enough; the Tea Party is mad at them all.
« susandibiase@yahoo.com wrote on Thursday, Apr 22 at 09:16 AM »
Under Pres. Bush the federal debt went from $5T to $10T. He gave big tax cuts mostly to the wealthy during wartime. Where were the budget hawks then? Bush did not enforce regulating the financial industry and when it blew up we had to spend more to prevent another great depression.

History says you don't starve the government during a recession. Obama got stuck spending a lot of federal dollars to keep the country afloat until the economy could start back up. Who gets the blame for this?

Did y'all just wake up one day and decide things were messed up? Have you been paying attention for the last decade?
« SCARLLETT5@AOL.COM wrote on Thursday, Apr 22 at 09:10 AM »
Where were these people when George Bush was giving his sales pitch for the no-Banker-Left- Behind Bail Out shortly before he left office.

American Internation Group (AIG) was given $175 Billion of our tax-payer dollars without a stipulation that the money had to be paid back.

Remember, Bush suddenly annonced that the economic sky was falling unless the American taxpayer give Wall Street, American and foreign banks billions in bail out funds. Local Congressman, Mike Rogers voted in favor of this bill initially while Bush was in office but voted against it after Obama took office. Could he have been voting strictly along party lines?

The vast majority of all Economists stated that this bail out was and could lead to disaster but that did not stop Mr. Rogers from supporting the Bush Bail-out.

The tea partiers are stupid and misguided souls.
« swccs@cableone.net wrote on Monday, Apr 19 at 10:50 PM »
well i am from cuba and i know more about the scocialist and communist than most of you that only know what freedom is now i have all 3 in me and that is scocialist, communist, and democracy.

you can keep the first two ill chose democracy cause i am 52 and lived it for 20 years and is not fun at all i love to eat, chose political parties, the press and best of the due process.

learn from cuba cause you are going the very same way and now look at cubans we are not allowed to go back.

dont vote is ok keep griping with out changing, keep being a poodle just do what they want is ok keep giving away your own freedom with out question is ok. cubans did we put castron in to solve all of our problems and hell came with him.

hel now you got venezula going the same way just keep doing what you are doing cause soon you wount need to visit cuba cause you will create your own.

all i have to say i love to vote and the press, food, and freedom. you have a great country and you dont eeven know it you burn your own flags and call it freedom of speach you hate each other and call it freedom of choice, you give up your privacy and civil rights and call it right to be safe. you follow what ever the goverment says and you call it the truth.. dam I must still be in cuba cause is what we did and now we pay for it. god help us and bless the usa.
« pagetigerstorm@aol.com wrote on Monday, Apr 19 at 03:47 PM »
Lets see some JSU prof, on the state payroll, complains about taxes, why doesnt he get a job in the private sector. These are just right wing ding bats! They will incite the next Tim McVeigh. Help balance the budget close the Depot!
« birdbrain2@mail.com wrote on Monday, Apr 19 at 10:31 AM »
It's funny that those who spent 8 years blaming President Bush for every evil imaginable and calling him an idiot, Nazi, and worse now tell us we must support the President.

Maybe not funny, but rather pathetic...

« alvinhurst@cableone.net wrote on Monday, Apr 19 at 10:25 AM »
The difference is that it was mostly those of the opposing party who criticized Bush and Clinton. Obama is beginning to catch it from both sides.
« BILLDJENNINGS@EXCITE.COM wrote on Monday, Apr 19 at 08:56 AM »
It was the truth. Many people criticized Bush for various reasons but it was not a criticizing of the federal government as a whole like it was under Clinton and is now under Obama. Bush and his policies doubled the National Debt in 8 years but that was okay for the conservatives and now it is somehow forbidden to add to the deficit. Like I said they can't ne taken seriously.lomvg
« cutit2fit@hotmail.com wrote on Monday, Apr 19 at 08:05 AM »
« JustPlainBill wrote on Saturday, Apr 17 at 09:43 AM »

This is a repeat of what happened under Clinton and the criticizing of the government stopped when Bush was elected............................................................LOLLL, that was suppose to be funny right?
« BILLDJENNINGS@EXCITE.COM wrote on Saturday, Apr 17 at 09:43 AM »
Remember the article...Bill Veazey had never protested...Where was he when Bush did away with constitutional rights and invoked the "Patriot Act". Where was he when the National Debt was doubled and the funding for a war was excluded from the federal budget. You cannot be a "Tea Party" member and only criticize one side of the aisle. I did not see them at the SRNC in New Orleans demonstrating nor do I see Independent or Democratic Constitutionalists speaking at their rallies. I cannot take them seriously unless they are calling for reform across both Houses of Congress. This is a repeat of what happened under Clinton and the criticizing of the government stopped when Bush was elected. If they ain't sincere they are a joke.
« catlover0153@yahoo.com wrote on Saturday, Apr 17 at 01:51 AM »
I would like to know more about joining the Tea party movement myself. I am sick to death of being taxed to death and there is beginning to quickly be no more middle class, you are either rich or poor and the government seems intent upon making the rich richer and the poor poorer. It is well past time for the regular people in America to stand up and make the politicians that are moving forward to bulldoze over the regular little people that made America what it is. I am tired of this so called politics as usual and no regard for the little people anymore. They have farethewell put the Mom & Pop businesses out of business and are working toward running us regular people into the ground. It is high time and way past time for us to speak up and say we are not going to take it anymore.....

Darci
« tugboat2@inbox.com wrote on Friday, Apr 16 at 10:14 PM »
Yes sir let us all drink a cup of tea!! It is soooo

refreshing.
« alvinhurst@cableone.net wrote on Friday, Apr 16 at 06:41 PM »
jamie, I saw it what I think you are referring to. He may have a high IQ but he ain't very smart. but even less smart are the democrat congressmen who are being thrown to the wolves by Obama. These people are voters! How dumb can you be? Not only are they voters they are almost in the majority.

I hope he keeps it up until election time.
« plc11@gmail.com wrote on Friday, Apr 16 at 06:36 PM »
Alexander Hamilton was right then: the people do govern. WE ELECTED PRESIDENT OBAMA!!!!!!!

« plc11@gmail.com wrote on Friday, Apr 16 at 06:35 PM »
BAAAAAHAAAAA WOOOO HOOOOOO!!!

HAAAAAHAAAA

« tampatider@yahoo.com wrote on Friday, Apr 16 at 06:31 PM »
Anybody see Obama, in his Stalinist arrogance, mocking the Tea Party members????

He needs to read a little history....Alexander Hamilton said, "Here Sir, The people govern."

Finally the people are realizing what's been happening decades....

« alvinhurst@cableone.net wrote on Friday, Apr 16 at 06:21 PM »
Generations, I doubt few if any tea partiers want to do away with SS and Medicare, etc. You are generalizing their position or what their position would bring. Sure these are socialistic programs but I doubt many of them want to eliminate all traces of socialism. And there is is difference in abiding social programs in place with a promise and new socialistic programs. It is not an all or none concept. It is a matter of degree. How much socialism does one want.

And the real objection from tea partiers, how much can we afford?
« alvinhurst@cableone.net wrote on Friday, Apr 16 at 06:14 PM »
Justplainbill, I missed that. Based on that I saw nothing delete worthy, imo.
« plc11@gmail.com wrote on Friday, Apr 16 at 06:03 PM »
Well, I downloaded the 'tea tea party' podcast: ........ BAAAAHAAAHAAAAHAAAA what losers