Rural economic development on two wheels
by StarEditorBobDavis
 Behind the Star
Sep 01, 2011 | 6440 views |  0 comments | 14 14 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink

A friend recently shared this link with me. In it Jerry Norquist, the executive director of Cycle Oregon, discusses how cycling events can bring prosperity to small towns. He gave an example of how one coffee shop owner in the small community where he lives reaped large financial rewards when a bike tour came through town.

Norquist says, "Most rural communities already have the assets that they need to promote cycling tourism. They just don’t know how to harness those assets." 

He says one community on its own may have a difficult time reaching the wider cycling audience, but a statewide effort can spread the word. 

With events like this, this and this, a trail like this and a mountain biking venue in the near future, lots of bike riders are familar with our region. The question is: What are the next steps to spread that reputation as a must-ride place? Please share your ideas. 

 

As its closing nears, Partlow looks for families who donated Bibles to facility
by StarEditorBobDavis
 Behind the Star
Aug 19, 2011 | 2741 views |  0 comments | 12 12 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink

Regina Poole, the director of Community Relations and Volunteers Services at Tuscaloosa’s W. D. Partlow Developmental Center, sends along an interesting request.

The facility, which describes itself as the “remaining state institution for people with intellectual disabilities,” is scheduled to close its doors at the end of September. Before it does, Partlow officials are looking for family members of people who long-ago donated items to the center.

 Poole writes that the center is: “[L]ooking for family members of Mrs. Lewis W. Jackson and Mrs. John R. Sickels. Each has a large, leather bound Bible donated to Partlow for use in the Lurleen Wallace Memorial Chapel in memory of their loved one. We would like to return these Bibles to the family. We are also looking for family members of Miss Minnie Lee Ford, Assistant Director of Nursing (1929-1968) to return a portrait of Miss Fields. Interested family members should call 205-554-4111.”

I asked Poole if she had reason to believe these families might be in The Star’s coverage area. No, she said, “I’m just trying to cover the state to make sure someone in the family (if any, or if any are still in Alabama) know about the Bibles and would like to have them back.” The Bibles were found in Partlow's chapel not long before it was knocked down.

If these family names sound familiar, give Partlow a call. And let the Star know, as well; this sounds like heck of a story.

A defense of Star's reporting on allegations made by councilman
by StarEditorBobDavis
 Behind the Star
Aug 08, 2011 | 2226 views |  0 comments | 15 15 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink

Consider this a defense of Anniston Star reporter Laura Camper. In his most recent column, Anniston Star Media Critic Paul Rilling criticized Camper’s July 6 article, “Little: Plans for judicial complex are troubling.”

Rilling, a former editor with The Star, is an experienced journalist. His monthly column is a useful exercise; it allows an independent voice to weigh on the work of the newspaper.

That said, I must respectfully disagree with his findings regarding Camper’s July 6 article.

Rilling wrote:

l

A basic rule of news writing is that a news story should “show, not tell.” This means the reporter tells readers what has happened, not the reporter’s or editor’s opinions about it. You don’t write that it was hot yesterday; you write about the temperature, the humidity, comparisons with other years, how people are dealing with it. You show that it was hot.

A July story in The Star, headlined, “Little: Plans for judicial complex are troubling,” told the reader what The Star thinks about Councilman Ben Little’s opposition to the judicial complex (July 6, Page 1A)

In the lead paragraph, it said, “Councilman Ben Little has made a point of questioning the way the proposed judicial complex has moved forward at council meetings and ward meetings, but has made no specific allegations nor offered any proof to back up his claims.”

The article, by Laura Camper, told readers what to think, then went on to support that viewpoint. The story is presented as a front-page news story but no new developments were reported. It made a good case for its point of view, but it belonged in the commentary pages.

l

In light of this critique, I revisited the article in question. By my count, it contains 29 statements of fact; most of them center on Little’s frequent allegations of wrongdoing on the part of those working on the city’s proposed judicial complex. To date, none of the officials mentioned in the article have challenged any of its facts.

 

The purpose of the article was to examine Little’s accusations and his failure thus far to provide any evidence for them. Little, an elected official, has repeatedly alleged corruption on the part of the entity charged with overseeing the construction of the judicial center, the Public Building Authority. Little’s allegations have taken place and continue to take place during public sessions of the City Council.

 

While reporting the article, Camper offered Councilman Little an opportunity to spell out the details of his allegations and produce evidence of them. Little declined, saying, “The PBA board knows what has been done and how things have unfolded.”

 

Several items are important to keep in mind:

 

l Little is accusing members of a municipal authority of wrongdoing, the sort that could be a violation of criminal law.

 

Little’s allegations are made in a public forum, which is aired live on The Star’s website.

 

Journalists are not stenographers. In its code of ethics, the Society of Professional Journalists writes that reporters should, “Test the accuracy of information from all sources and exercise care to avoid inadvertent error.”

 

That is what Camper and The Star did in the July 6 article. Quite simply, we asked a public official for evidence of frequently asserted claims. He declined, and we reported that he declined and put his opposition to the project in context. Reporters’ and editors’ personal opinions on Little and his opposition to the judicial complex project were (a.) not voiced and (b.) wholly irrelevant to the article in question.

 

Despite a diligent search of the story, I can find no support for the claim that The Star told “the reader what The Star thinks about Councilman Ben Little’s opposition to the judicial complex.”

 

Congressman attributes editorial board’s “world view” as reason for not visiting
by StarEditorBobDavis
 Behind the Star
Jul 31, 2011 | 2203 views |  0 comments | 13 13 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink

(Cross-posted from National Conference of Editorial Writers blog.)

The editorial board of The Anniston Star regularly meets with politicians from local, state and federal offices. During his two terms as Alabama governor, Bob Riley was a frequent visitor to the newspaper. We regularly sit down with Alabama’s two U.S. senators, Richard Shelby and Jeff Sessions, as well as other politicians from across the state.

The walls of The Star’s offices are full of snapshots of governors, including George C. Wallace, who when in town would visit with the newspaper’s editorial board. (By the way, Wallace preferred to refer to the newspaper by the derisive nickname “Red Star.”)

During campaign season, the pace quickens as scores of hopefuls come through our doors seeking endorsement.

The meetings can be lively and enlightening, as politicians explain their positions, field tough questions and lay out their visions for the future.

However, one local politician, five-term U.S. Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Anniston, has been an infrequent visitor to the newspaper. He’s not visited since fall 2008, though he makes regular visits to other newspaper boards in his district. Before that, his appearances before the Anniston Star board were spotty.

The reason, says his press secretary Shea Snider, is that The Anniston Star editorial board and the congressman have "different world views."

"Every time [Rogers] goes in, it’s a hostile environment," Snider said. "There’s no value to those meetings."

She emphasized that the congressman and his office are always happy to respond to The Star’s reporting staff, as well as to questions from this writer; it’s the editorial board the congressman has a problem with.

It is accurate that the Star's editorial board subjects politicians to tough questions. For its part, the newspaper believes holding the people's representatives to account is part of its First Amendment responsibilities. That standard is applied to politicians across the ideological spectrum.

An informal survey of National Conference of Editorial Writers members via listserve showed that Rogers’ refusal to meet with The Star is out of step with most Washington politicians. Most will meet with local editorial boards.

"Our senators drop in for a visit about once a year," wrote Jackman Wilson, editorial page editor of The Register-Guard in Eugene, Ore. "Our local congressman stops by more often for useful backgrounders on issues of interest to him and to us (and for gossip that is even more useful)."

Editors mentioned that there are exceptions, a few senators and congressmen who for one reason or another refused to darken their doors. It usually has something to do with something written by the newspaper that the officeholder didn't like.

At the NCEW’s 2010 convention in Dallas. Texas Gov. Rick Perry, who is now said to be considering a run for president, spoke to members of the NCEW, but refused to take part in the traditional Q&A session following his remarks. Perry’s reason for skipping out on question time was that he had a tight schedule. However, after leaving the stage the governor spent a lengthy session chatting with friends in the meeting room and then carrying on an extended TV interview just outside its doors.

Then-NCEW president Tom Waseleski wrote Perry afterwards, calling the snub "an affront to any notion of civil discourse, such as the kind you have called for on other occasions."

Tom Moran, editorial page editor of New Jersey’s Star-Ledger, described the refusal to meet with editorial boards as folly on the part of politicians. “When these guys choose not to defend their positions, it hardly advances their cause,” he wrote.

Mark C. Mahoney, editorial page editor at The Post-Star in Glens Falls, N.Y., boiled down the reasons a politician might or might not visit with an editorial board. "It all depends on the degree with which you have criticized the individual and that individual's personal degree of tolerance for criticism," Mahoney wrote. "Some can take a little criticism. Some can take a lot. Some can't take any. Those that can't take any criticism have tended not to meet with us."

Bob Davis, editor of The Anniston Star and a member of its editorial board, is secretary/treasurer of the National Conference of Editorial Writers.

Help us police online comments
by StarEditorBobDavis
 Behind the Star
Jul 06, 2011 | 3366 views |  0 comments | 8 8 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink

We continue to work out some kinks with our new Facebook commenting system at AnnistonStar.com.

One way readers can help is by reporting inappropriate language in our comments by selecting the “REPORT” button to the right of each comment.

Here's how: Move your mouse to the right-side of the comment  and an “X” appears. Clicking it gives a user the option to “Mark as Spam” or “Report as Abuse” comments that violate our terms of use – no name-calling, no abusive or profane language and no personal attacks.

Doing this will help us better police comments, and that is something that creates a more civil exchange.

 - Bob Davis, Editor 

Today's Events
event calendar Icon_info

Tuesday, 18, 2013
post a new event Icon_info

Pond Spring- The Gener... 3:50 PM
Oxford Farmers market 12:00 AM to 11:59 PM
Join us for the kick-off of Oxford's first...
Oxford Farmers market 12:00 AM to 11:59 PM
Join us for the kick-off of Oxford's first...
Anniston to extend search for city manager
by Paige Rentz
prentz@annistonstar.com
Jun 18, 2013 | 80 views |  0 comments | 5 5 recommendations | email to a friend | print
The city of Anniston is extending the deadline in its search for a new city manager and offering more money to give the City Council a wider pool of applicants to consider. “We want to take our time,” Mayor Vaughn Stewart said. “We want to increase the number of applicants ... and make sure we leave no stones uncovered in getting the word out around the country that the city of Anniston is looking for a new city manager.” By Saturday, the initial deadline, 41 individuals had submitted applications. Candidates now have until July 13 to apply for the top job at City Hall. Councilwoman Millie Harris, standing at City Hall with the list of candidates in hand, said reading the applications has been a very time-consuming process. “We’ve got some good applicants, but we would like to increase that applicant pool,” she said, noting that some of the applicants simply are not qualified. In an effort to entice more candidates, the city is also extending the salary range for the position to a maximum of $150,000, Stewart said. The job was initially advertised at $90,000-$120,000. “In the big scheme of things, hiring a city manager is one of the biggest decisions this council will make,” Stewart said. “Under this form of government, that’s a huge position, and we want to make sure we do it right.” Under the city’s council-manager form of government, the City Council hires the city manager, who has the power to hire other city employees. The only other appointment the council makes is for municipal judge. “We cannot direct department heads; we cannot direct employees,” Stewart said. “All was can do it make sure we have a qualified manager in place that will carry out the policies the council adopts as a means to move the city forward.” Stewart said the council is looking for a progressive, forward-thinking, transformative leader with a sense of enthusiasm that can unite both city employees and the community. Harris said she is looking for someone who has successful experience as a city manager or assistant city manager in a city comparable to Anniston, and it is important to her that a candidate have a bachelor’s or master’s degree in public administration. Managerial experience as a department head and credentials from the International City/County Management Association are also pluses, she said. More than half of the applicants have managed local governments ranging from Jupiter, Fla., to Dover, Del. About 10 other applicants have served as assistant managers, department-level managers, or in state or federal agencies. Those with no municipal management experience come from such backgrounds as the military, construction, media, consulting and non-profits. Harris said she’s also on the lookout for red flags like frequent job changes. Stewart noted the city’s seven managers in 15 years and said the council is looking for a candidate who will stick with the city for a significant period of time. Hoyt said the city advertised the position on several national job banks and with municipal associations all over the region, including those in Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Oklahoma, Tennessee and Kentucky. He said he will again advertise the position in these same locations, making note of the salary change. Asked about the possibility of the city hiring a search firm to help lure applicants, Hoyt said he duplicated the processes he’s been through as an applicant in searches run both by cities and search firms. “We’re basically following the same pattern that I’ve seen done time and time again,” he said. “We can hire somebody and give them a bunch of money to do the same thing.” Staff writer Paige Rentz: 256-235-3564. On Twitter @PRentz_Star.
Anniston Middle's "failing" grade may not lead to tax credits after all
by Tim Lockette
tlockette@annistonstar.com
Jun 18, 2013 | 2812 views |  0 comments | 42 42 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Anniston Middle School. (Photo by Trent Penny/The Anniston Star)
Anniston Middle School. (Photo by Trent Penny/The Anniston Star)
slideshow
Anniston Middle School is among 78 "failing" schools where students' families will qualify for a state tax credit under the Alabama Accountability Act, state school officials announced Tuesday. But whether any of those families will be able to collect the tax credits remains very much in doubt. Anniston's school board has already voted to close the middle school. Local private schools have said they won't accept a set of scholarships that are linked to the tax credits. Local public schools say court orders in the state's decades-old desegregation case may prohibit Anniston students from transferring. “I will approve no transfers until we’ve cleared this with our attorneys in Lee v. Macon or the Justice Department,” said Joan Frazier, superintendent of Anniston City Schools. Frazier and school leaders across the state had long awaited the release of a list of schools determined to be "failing" by state school officials. Under the Alabama Accountability Act, passed by the Legislature in February, the state will give tax credits of about $3,500 to families with students in "failing" schools -- if they transfer their children to non-failing public schools or enroll them in private schools. List long awaited Just which schools were "failing" remained a matter of debate for months, as lawmakers debated the criteria and ultimately passed a new definition of failing schools in May and granted the Alabama Department of Education the power to interpret those rules. The final list, released Tuesday morning, contained 78 schools, most of them middle or junior high schools, and nearly all of them in high-poverty areas. Anniston Middle was the only school in Calhoun County that made the list. In a webcast press conference, state schools Superintendent Tommy Bice said middle schools may have figured so heavily in the list because they're the only grade span in which all students are tested under the state accountability system. Anniston Middle School Principal Lynwood Hawkins declined comment on the "failing" rating Tuesday, referring all questions to Frazier. Frazier defended the middle school, pointing to state figures that show improvement in test scores over the past six years. In 2007, 46 percent of the school’s students met or exceeded state standards on the Alabama Reading and Math Test. In 2012, 60 percent of students hit that mark. “We fit the same pattern as other schools on the list,” she said, noting that other “failing” schools had shown improvement in students’ scores on the test. A pathway out? Sen. Del Marsh, R-Anniston, the Accountability Act's primary author, said the designation will give Anniston's families a choice. "Many of them will simply choose to remain," he said. "But those who want to move to another school can do that now." Marsh has long promoted the Accountability Act as a pathway out of failing schools for students who are stuck in them. Transferring out of Anniston Middle may not be so easy, though. The school is the city's only middle-grades institution, which means that students hoping to transfer to another school would have to attend a school outside their district. Even if Anniston's desegregation order allows students to transfer out, nearby school systems are bound by orders that keep them from allowing students in, school officials say. “Due to our desegregation order, we will not be accepting transfer students under the Accountability Act at this time,” Calhoun County Superintendent Joe Dyar said. Oxford City Schools is under a similar order, director of student services Roy Bennett said. Jacksonville City Schools Superintendent Jon Campbell didn't cite a court order, but said the city's school board has already agreed not to alter its admissions policy, which limits admission to Jacksonville residents and children of full-time Jacksonville State University employees. He said board members wanted to keep the city's resources focused on its residents. Scholarship dilemma Desegregation orders don't prevent students from leaving for private schools, but it's still not clear the tax credits will be available for those students either. The state Department of Revenue announced Tuesday that the tax credits won't be available to families zoned for failing schools who are already in private schools. The department also announced that the tax credits won't be available if students transfer to private schools that don't accept scholarships created available a separate program set up under Section 9 of the Accountability Act. Section 9 offers tax credits to businesses if they donate to scholarships programs for low-income children. Leaders of three Anniston private schools -- the Donoho School, Faith Christian School and Sacred Heart of Jesus Catholic School -- told The Star earlier this year that they had no plan to accept the Section 9 scholarships. "It takes away our independence when we have to report information to the state like a public school," Jan Hurd, head of the Donoho School, told The Star on Tuesday. Hurd said Section 9 scholarships would require schools to report test grades and other information to the school system. Hurd said she did not know until Tuesday about the ban on tax credits for schools refusing Section 9. She said the school's board of directors had already decided to decline the scholarships, though the issue would be brought up again at a coming board meeting. Attempts to reach the directors of Faith Christian and Sacred Heart were unsuccessful Tuesday. State revenue director Julie Magee said the decision to link the tax credits to Section 9 was simple. The Accountability Act, she said, defines a private school as one that accepts the Section 9 scholarships. "We're just doing what the law says," she said. School to close Anniston Middle School's place on the failing schools list may be short-lived. The city's school board voted earlier this year to close the school, part of a citywide reorganization being done in response to the city's declining enrollment. City officials have also expressed interest in using the middle school site, across from Lowe's onMcClellan Boulevard, for commercial development. School officials have not set a date for the closure, but Frazier said it will likely happen in two or three years. Marsh said that even with the closure, parents of middle-grades kids in Anniston should continue to qualify for the tax credit. He said the change wasn't a true school closure, but just the closure of a building. "If it was failing in one spot, it's failing in the next," he said. Frazier said the change was indeed a school closure, with Cobb Elementary slated for conversion to a junior high for grades 7-9 and the system's sixth-graders expected to be distributed among the city's elementary schools. If Anniston Middle's families do get the tax credit, that credit would expire once they age out of the middle school -- thus becoming zoned for Anniston High School. Anniston High hasn't met state goals on standardized tests for years, but it wasn't on the failing schools list. Marsh said students using the tax credits who aged out of Anniston Middle wouldn't have to go to Anniston High. "They could continue to go, they'd just have to pay the tuition to go to a private school," he said. Marsh has long maintained that the Accountability Act isn’t perfect, but is the start of a system of school choice for the state’s students. “There’s a bridge there, so that if they don’t want to be in the middle school, they can leave,” he said. Capitol & statewide reporter Tim Lockette: 256-294-4193. On Twitter @TLockette_Star.
A partially completed house in Eva's Corner subdivision in Oxford. (Photo by Stephen Gross/The Anniston Star)
A partially completed house in Eva's Corner subdivision in Oxford. (Photo by Stephen Gross/The Anniston Star)
slideshow
HOT BLAST: 'We must move beyond guns themselves'
Jun 18, 2013 | 55 views |  0 comments | 7 7 recommendations | email to a friend | print
A teddy bear, flowers and a candle are the only items left at the entrance to Sandy Hook Elementary School on the six-month anniversary of the Dec. 14 shooting in Newtown, Conn., on June 14. (AP Photo/Jessica Hill)
A teddy bear, flowers and a candle are the only items left at the entrance to Sandy Hook Elementary School on the six-month anniversary of the Dec. 14 shooting in Newtown, Conn., on June 14. (AP Photo/Jessica Hill)
slideshow
Writing in The New York Review of Books, Georgetown Law professor David Cole examines the failures to pass gun-control measures over the six months since the Sandy Hook massacre.

In Facing the Real Gun Problem, Cole claims gun-control supporters have a fundamental misunderstanding of gun owners and their advocacy groups.

He writes, "[A]ny effort to address gun violence must also look beyond gun regulation, to the root causes of the violence. As noted above, the vast majority of gun deaths are caused by handguns. The Constitution forbids banning ordinary guns, and Americans do not support such bans anyway. And with 270 million guns already in private hands, it is too late for a meaningful ban in any event. Accordingly, if we want to do something about gun violence, we must move beyond guns themselves, to address the problem at its roots." 

- Bob Davis 
-->
Marketplace