The Anniston Star

facebook twitter
October 24, 2014

HOT BLAST: Early reviews of Paul Ryan's new anti-poverty plan

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Thursday, July 24, 2014 3:56 pm

Paul Ryan, Mitt Romney's 2012 vice presidential candidate and a Republican congressman from Wisconsin, unveiled a new proposal to fight poverty this week. Here are some reviews:

Danny Vinik writes:

On Thursday, House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan surprised liberals with the release of a new antipoverty plan that may include his best idea ever.

In contrast to Ryan’s last four budgets, which proposed huge cuts to federal antipoverty programs, Ryan’s new proposal is deficit-neutral. In fact, although Ryan still wrongly believes that misaligned incentives and not a lack of jobs are the biggest impediment to workers, part of his proposal even has broad appeal.

Rep. Paul Ryan
Pete Marovich

Brian Beutler writes:

You don't need to love Representative Paul Ryan's new plan to reform anti-poverty programs to admit that it's an improvement over his old plan that entailed using increased suffering as an inducement to work. You also don't need to love Paul Ryan's new plan to reform anti-poverty programs to acknowledge that he's left (or perhaps gotten himself excommunicated from) the cult of Ayn Rand.

Callie Gable writes:

Ryan proposes a pilot program called the “Opportunity Grant,” which offers states the ability to use the funds they currently get for a range of programs to run individually focused programs specifically intended to help needy individuals achieve upward mobility and stay out of poverty long term. (If states want, they can stick with running the existing federal welfare programs, which offer very little flexibility in the way of implementation.)

Henry Olsen writes:

Ryanism 2.0 appears to be a creed that says the government has an important role in caring for those who genuinely cannot support themselves. More important, it holds that government has an equally important role in helping people on the margin to support themselves.   

Emily Badger writes:

Another crucial element of Ryan's plan is that we should test results as states try out new programs, replicate what works and ditch what doesn't. In theory, evidenced-based policy is an important idea, and it's one everyone can agree on. But, particularly in the realm of poverty, measuring success is much more complicated than Ryan suggests (his proposal devotes just one page to this topic).

Connect with us

Featured Events

Online poll

HOT BLAST: Do you agree with Piedmont's no-pregame-prayers policy for football games? (Take our reader poll.)

After receiving a complaint from the Freedom From Religion Foundation earlier this year, officials from Piedmont City Schools halted the practice of public prayer before home football games. Do you agree with the district's decision?

Total Votes: 205

Loading…